Skip to main content

Film regulation and the BBFC

1) Research the BBFC in more detail: what is the institution responsible for? How is it funded? What link does it have to government? This history of the BBFC page may help.

responsibility of classifying films since 1912, video tapes and discs since 1985, and more recently, online content. BBFC is here to help everyone in the UK choose age-appropriate films, videos and websites, wherever and however they watch or use them. regularly consult people right across the country to listen to what they think and feel about what’s appropriate for families and children of all ages.

Statutory powers over film remain with the local councils, which can overrule any of the BBFC’s decisions on appeal, passing films they reject, banning films we’ve passed, and even waiving cuts, making new ones, or altering the age ratings for films shown in their area. But generally, from as early as the mid-1920s, local authorities have accepted their decisions.Funded through charged fees from the distributors of the film such as advertising and Certification.

2) Read this BBFC guide to how films are rated. Summarise the process in 50 words.

BBFC’s classifying decisions made by the Chief Executive, the President and the two Vice-Presidents taking final responsibility. They usually view DVDs on their own, called ‘solo viewing’. Films for cinema are classified by teams of two. Controversial or extreme content is seen by teams to get a range of opinion.

3) Read this BBFC section on landmark decisions. Why did The Dark Knight generate a large amount of media coverage regarding its certificate? Do you agree with the 12A certificate The Dark Knight was awarded?

The 12A rating resulted in much press coverage and complaints from members of the public, who thought the violence was too strong to be contained at that category as there had been many scenes but also complaints around the violence within the film as some people felt that even though it was not clealry show, the very idea of the implication that something had happened created a stronger reaction to some viewers - 450 complaints. I believe that the film should be 12 isntead of 12A as i think that the film would most likely be too intense in its implications and dark themed for anyone younger than 12 but i do not agree with the idea that it should be any higher as it is explicitly stated that the guidelines were followed that were based off of the opinions of the public themselves. Furthermore the fact that of the 450 complaints less than 10 % ~45 had actually watched the film with children and shows that it was mostly due to the ratings 
controversy that there had been a surge in complaints.

4) What are the guidelines for a 12A certificate - Blinded By The Light's cinema certificate (it was rated 12 for its home video release)?

12 racist language and behaviour, moderate bad language

There is infrequent moderate bad language ('wanker') as well as milder terms ('bloody hell', 'shit', 'crap', 'frickin', 'sod', 'Jesus').

There is a scene in which two men are attacked by members of the National Front, resulting in brief bloody injury detail. There are racist references made to "Pakis" as one character is spat on and made to move from his seat in a restaurant at the request of some racists. Racism is not condoned within the film.

5) The BBFC website offers an explanation of every classification it makes and detailed case studies on selected titles. Look at the rating for Blinded By The Light and explain why it was given a 12A certificate for cinema release.

There is infrequent moderate bad language ('wanker') as well as milder terms ('bloody hell', 'shit', 'crap', 'frickin', 'sod', 'Jesus').

There is a scene in which two men are attacked by members of the National Front, resulting in brief bloody injury detail. There are racist references made to "Pakis" as one character is spat on and made to move from his seat in a restaurant at the request of some racists. Racism is not condoned within the film.


Films classified 12A and video works classified 12 contain material that is not generally suitable for children aged under 12.
No one younger than 12 may see a 12A film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult. Adults planning to take a child under 12 to view a 12A film should consider whether the film is suitable for that child. To help them decide, we recommend that they check the content advice for that film in advance.


Dangerous Behaviour: No promotion of potentially dangerous behaviour which children are likely to copy. No glamorisation of realistic or easily accessible weapons such as knives. No endorsement of anti-social behaviour.

Discrimination: Discriminatory language or behaviour must not be endorsed by the work as a whole. Aggressive discriminatory language or behaviour is unlikely to be acceptable unless clearly condemned.

Drugs: Misuse of drugs must be infrequent and should not be glamorised or give detailed instruction.

Language: There may be moderate bad language. Strong language may be permitted, depending on the manner in which it is used, who is using the language, its frequency within the work as a whole and any special contextual justification.

Nudity: There may be nudity, but in a sexual context it must be brief and discreet.

Sex: Sexual activity may be briefly and discreetly portrayed. Moderate sex references are permitted, but frequent crude references are unlikely to be acceptable.

Sexual Violence and Sexual: There may be verbal references to sexual violence provided they are not graphic. The stronger forms of sexual violence, including rape, may only be implied and any sexual threat or abusive behaviour must be brief and negatively presented.

Threat and horror: There may be moderate physical and psychological threat and horror sequences. Although some scenes may be disturbing, the overall tone should not be. Horror sequences should not be frequent or sustained.

Violence: There may be moderate violence but it should not dwell on detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood, but occasional gory moments may be permitted if justified by the context.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Magazine first rough

  Front Double page spread Extra page

Print brief research and planning

Brief Print You should create  four pages from a music magazine  – specifically: a  front cover  featuring the artist/band promoted in Task One a  two-page interview  with the artist/band one page with  content relevant to the magazine  and the target audience. The magazine targets a  mainstream music audience . The front cover and interview can use some images from the same photoshoot but other original images should also be used that offer some visual variety. The interview should be used to promote the tour and the music track. It should also reinforce the brand image of the artist/band and integrate some reference to the footwear manufacturers who are sponsoring the band/artist. What do you need to produce? 1) The front page (A4 portrait) for a new, original music magazine aimed at a mainstream audience that you have created: Title and masthead - DY (Discordant Youth) Selling line (slogan) - ( Rising star/Revolutionising what it means to ...

Rough draft feedback

Estimated current grade: C   Comments & feedback:   There are some very nice moments here – the artist branding is excellent (in fact, you should make more of it!) and the narrative/performance crossover basically works. Some of the performance shots are really good and the simple narrative is satisfying. The challenge now is to look over the structure of the three minutes and also think about whether it’s worth shooting or re-shooting any of the sections. You have a shot of the Converse shoes (very briefly) but I wonder if that element of the brief is something you could make more of? Is there any way you could tie it into the narrative at all? The performance element – the close-ups and moving camera are good but the wide shot with the backdrop not covering the whole shot. Deliberate?  Lip syncing (and guitar syncing) is not quite on it – is that a performance or editing thing? This wil...