Skip to main content

Film regulation and the BBFC

1) Research the BBFC in more detail: what is the institution responsible for? How is it funded? What link does it have to government? This history of the BBFC page may help.

responsibility of classifying films since 1912, video tapes and discs since 1985, and more recently, online content. BBFC is here to help everyone in the UK choose age-appropriate films, videos and websites, wherever and however they watch or use them. regularly consult people right across the country to listen to what they think and feel about what’s appropriate for families and children of all ages.

Statutory powers over film remain with the local councils, which can overrule any of the BBFC’s decisions on appeal, passing films they reject, banning films we’ve passed, and even waiving cuts, making new ones, or altering the age ratings for films shown in their area. But generally, from as early as the mid-1920s, local authorities have accepted their decisions.Funded through charged fees from the distributors of the film such as advertising and Certification.

2) Read this BBFC guide to how films are rated. Summarise the process in 50 words.

BBFC’s classifying decisions made by the Chief Executive, the President and the two Vice-Presidents taking final responsibility. They usually view DVDs on their own, called ‘solo viewing’. Films for cinema are classified by teams of two. Controversial or extreme content is seen by teams to get a range of opinion.

3) Read this BBFC section on landmark decisions. Why did The Dark Knight generate a large amount of media coverage regarding its certificate? Do you agree with the 12A certificate The Dark Knight was awarded?

The 12A rating resulted in much press coverage and complaints from members of the public, who thought the violence was too strong to be contained at that category as there had been many scenes but also complaints around the violence within the film as some people felt that even though it was not clealry show, the very idea of the implication that something had happened created a stronger reaction to some viewers - 450 complaints. I believe that the film should be 12 isntead of 12A as i think that the film would most likely be too intense in its implications and dark themed for anyone younger than 12 but i do not agree with the idea that it should be any higher as it is explicitly stated that the guidelines were followed that were based off of the opinions of the public themselves. Furthermore the fact that of the 450 complaints less than 10 % ~45 had actually watched the film with children and shows that it was mostly due to the ratings 
controversy that there had been a surge in complaints.

4) What are the guidelines for a 12A certificate - Blinded By The Light's cinema certificate (it was rated 12 for its home video release)?

12 racist language and behaviour, moderate bad language

There is infrequent moderate bad language ('wanker') as well as milder terms ('bloody hell', 'shit', 'crap', 'frickin', 'sod', 'Jesus').

There is a scene in which two men are attacked by members of the National Front, resulting in brief bloody injury detail. There are racist references made to "Pakis" as one character is spat on and made to move from his seat in a restaurant at the request of some racists. Racism is not condoned within the film.

5) The BBFC website offers an explanation of every classification it makes and detailed case studies on selected titles. Look at the rating for Blinded By The Light and explain why it was given a 12A certificate for cinema release.

There is infrequent moderate bad language ('wanker') as well as milder terms ('bloody hell', 'shit', 'crap', 'frickin', 'sod', 'Jesus').

There is a scene in which two men are attacked by members of the National Front, resulting in brief bloody injury detail. There are racist references made to "Pakis" as one character is spat on and made to move from his seat in a restaurant at the request of some racists. Racism is not condoned within the film.


Films classified 12A and video works classified 12 contain material that is not generally suitable for children aged under 12.
No one younger than 12 may see a 12A film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult. Adults planning to take a child under 12 to view a 12A film should consider whether the film is suitable for that child. To help them decide, we recommend that they check the content advice for that film in advance.


Dangerous Behaviour: No promotion of potentially dangerous behaviour which children are likely to copy. No glamorisation of realistic or easily accessible weapons such as knives. No endorsement of anti-social behaviour.

Discrimination: Discriminatory language or behaviour must not be endorsed by the work as a whole. Aggressive discriminatory language or behaviour is unlikely to be acceptable unless clearly condemned.

Drugs: Misuse of drugs must be infrequent and should not be glamorised or give detailed instruction.

Language: There may be moderate bad language. Strong language may be permitted, depending on the manner in which it is used, who is using the language, its frequency within the work as a whole and any special contextual justification.

Nudity: There may be nudity, but in a sexual context it must be brief and discreet.

Sex: Sexual activity may be briefly and discreetly portrayed. Moderate sex references are permitted, but frequent crude references are unlikely to be acceptable.

Sexual Violence and Sexual: There may be verbal references to sexual violence provided they are not graphic. The stronger forms of sexual violence, including rape, may only be implied and any sexual threat or abusive behaviour must be brief and negatively presented.

Threat and horror: There may be moderate physical and psychological threat and horror sequences. Although some scenes may be disturbing, the overall tone should not be. Horror sequences should not be frequent or sustained.

Violence: There may be moderate violence but it should not dwell on detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood, but occasional gory moments may be permitted if justified by the context.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parallel and contrapuntal sound practical

Deutschland 83: case study

  Introduction: Reviews and features Read the following reviews and features on  Deutschland 83 : The Guardian - Your next box set: Deutschland 83 The Guardian - Deutschland 83 Pity the Germans don't like it 1) Find one positive aspect and one criticism of  Deutschland 83  in the reviews. created an irresistible export: a funky exercise in pop nostalgia underpinned by actual events.  It’s a perfect moment in a near-perfect series 2) Why does the second Guardian article suggest the Germans didn't like the show? By focusing the story around Martin Rauch, a young East German border guard going undercover in the west, it doesn’t just make the viewer empathise with a Stasi agent on a human level – in the way The Lives of Others did – it makes us engage with the socialist regime’s worldview, in which a military exercise in West Germany poses a potentially existential threat. 3) Find three 'below the line' comments from either of the Guardian articles. What did the audience th

Mise-en-scene recreation: Learner response

  Feedback: Overall, his is a superb recreation of a challenging scene: well done! Excellent performances + costume : several elements of mise-en-scene are clearly considered here. so many nice touches and he conversation is edited impressively - good pace to it Audio levels and one moment where Cassius looks a he camera provide us with some EBI's but this is a great start to media Class Feedback: Face punch could've been more explosive (more AGGRESSION) Costume was good Location was alright Good camera work Audio varies a lot (background audio) Lighting not night  Actor looking into camera punch sound effect Own assessment: WWW: i believe hat overall the setting was pretty good for being a little run down with a car park while he costume was also faithful to the scene as it creates he look and feel of the characters that of Tyler being a little random with a leather jacket and floral shirt and he narrator having a suit, as if he had just finished work. Also the camera work was